Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Zimm_Man_Fan

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:49 PM
Number of posts: 6,972

About Me

The last one to serve on the last jury before this joint takes its rightful place in the land of the 404 error, be sure and turn off the lights. See yah.

Journal Archives

My screen name is explained in my sig line, but the fact that it sends you into

conniption fits of puerile rage - especially when you've lost the debate and are desperately trying to change the subject, as here - delights me to no end.

Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 08:34 PM (1 replies)

No, I did not. I said on THIS board regarding YOUR situation no one knows

who the other poster is. We have not the slightest idea what the circumstances were in the SUPPOSED incident the so-called "taxpayer" described, whether they posted pseudo-anonymously or there were a lot of other informational clues about other poster's identities that are not available here.

You just tell one lie after another, without a shred of shame.

Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 04:21 PM (0 replies)

Skinner/Naveed did precisely what his duties as Admin required of him -

he banned the member. We are all anonymous here: no one knows who "Satanica" really is in the actual world, and you know who none of us are or where we are at either. You were never for a split second under any kind of actual "threat," all your drama-mongering notwithstanding.

That said, the member should not have said what he said, and has earned his banishment from this site.

Now to this:

A few D I members helped me figure out where the person was posting from

That person now has to be held accountable

1. I don't believe that you have figured out "where the person was posting from" for a New York second. 2. But if true, it is YOU who have turned stalker. What do you mean by "held accountable"? Sounds like...a threat.

Skinner/Naveed did their duty and rightly banned the poster; now do yours and move on.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 03:55 PM (0 replies)

Your phony link goes to nowhere. Wanna drop the drama queen theatrics

and tell us what's going on?

Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 03:40 PM (1 replies)

BTW: George Zimmerman = acquitted by a jury of his peers and cleared by

Eric Holder's DOJ of ANY wrongdoing.

Thug Wannabe Saint Skittles = still pushing up daises somewhere in Florida.

Deal.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 03:26 PM (0 replies)

My post claiming those things was spot-on; it has been your subsequent

pitiful offerings that have been both non responsive and full of shit.

Got it?

Good.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 03:19 PM (1 replies)

It IS non responsive, as it does not reply to or address the subject under discussion.

And you are not "actively saying" anything - you don't have the guts for that. Instead, you're cloaking it in a cute little paraphrase of "FOS." You don't have the stones to actually come out and post what you mean - that's your SOP.

<------------G
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 03:14 PM (1 replies)

Sport-No-I didn't. I Pointed out that polls in May about presidential elections

are notoriously inaccurate, and provided two examples to substantiate my claim. That's not "comparing" anything, i.e., saying one thing is just like another. It's pointing out a historical fact, and then providing substantiation to back it up.

You need to work on more than just your capitalization skills, it appears....

They still teach entry-level Logic & Critical Thinking classes at most community colleges. You might start there.

Good luck!
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 02:44 PM (1 replies)

Listen up

t's NOT "a bill to protect Women (Sic) from rapists": you simply made that up.

It's a bill to allow trial lawyers to get rich, by allowing a woman claiming to have been raped to sue her alleged rapists employer, even if that alleged rape takes place outside the workplace. It's an attempt to add "deep pockets" to a lawsuit by allowing an entity that had NOTHING to do with the alleged assault - an alleged rapists employer - to be sued.

It should have been voted against, and it's deplorable that it is set to become law.

Since you don't read so well, I reprinted it for you. Sound out the sentences this time, if you still can't comprehend the words on the screen in front of you.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 12:16 PM (0 replies)

The Rain in Maine dodged the ball and wound up in Spain.

The Pacific Ocean is entirely different in June than it is in September.


^^^^^^My reply above makes every bit as much sense to what was written as yours does to me. It's a complete non sequitur. Reply to what I actually wrote or buzz off. Thanks.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 11:54 AM (1 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »