Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:49 PM
Number of posts: 6,972

About Me

The last one to serve on the last jury before this joint takes its rightful place in the land of the 404 error, be sure and turn off the lights. See yah.

Journal Archives

Man Pushes His Way Into Apartment, Threatens Homeowner, Gets Shot

A Yuma resident at Medpark Apartments heard knocking at their door around 8 p.m. Friday evening.

Sgt. Lori Franklin said, “When the residents opened the door, Selitto pushed his way into the apartment.” The Yuma Police Department are identifying that man as 48-year-old Thomas Selitto.

Franklin said, “When he was asked to leave, he came towards the homeowner, then they proceeded to shoot Selitto.” He was later pronounced deceased.

Franklin says the family was home at the time and are considered victims in this case.

More at link:

Good shooting, homeowner! Good riddance, criminal thug!

A good explanation of the difference between "stand your ground" defenses and normal self-defense, too.

Migrants Who Threatened To Cut Throat Of 6-Year-Old Lied About Age To Get Into Classroom

Two child migrants arrested in January after a 12-year-old girl was forced to perform sex acts with them are now thought to be adults at least 21 years of age.

The two men who have not been named but are reported to be Iranian citizens were officially 15 and 16-years-old at the time of their arrest four weeks ago. One of the men has now been proved to be “at least 21 years old” through dental examinations, while the second is also thought to be an adult but with no conclusive evidence having yet been brought forward, reports Bild.

The men were admitted to a children’s migrant aid centre when they arrived in Dusseldorf last year after they had managed to fool the German government over their true age. Once in the centre they were allowed into the classroom alongside other children from Dusseldorf, and they were able there to gain access to the much younger girl.

She was “compelled and forced into sexual acts” over the course of some days, said the prosecutor. Germany’s Express reports a six year old boy who discovered that the girl was being abused was threatened with having his throat cut for telling on the pair.

More at link:

Norweigan government: We will abandon international law if Sweden collapses

Norway is ready to abandon the Geneva Convention if Sweden collapses. The border will be closed by force, and Swedish refugees will be rejected without the possibility to seek asylum. "We are prepared for the worst," says Prime Minister Erna Solberg.

There is such an imminent danger that the Schengen agreement, and the asylum system in Sweden will break down, that Norway must have an emergency legislation in place in case it happens, believes Norway's Prime Minister Erna Solberg. Therefore, she has crafted a law that will allow for Norwegian authorities to reject asylum seekers who do not come directly from a conflict area.

This means that asylum seekers who want to come to Norway from Russia, but also from the other Nordic countries, will be denied the right to seek asylum, which otherwise is anchored in the UN Refugee Convention.

"It is a force majeure proposal which we will have in the event that it all breaks down, that the flow (of refugees) just comes, and they all end up in Norway, because we are at the top of Europe. Norway is the end point, is not it," says Erna Solberg in an interview with Berlingske.

More at link:

Norway starts to wake up. Remember this OP, my fellow DI'ers?

Those of us on the right side of this issue are being proven more and more right every single day.

Someone's so discombobuolated by their loss of credibility in this thread

that they're losing track of what they've posted altogether. Sad.

You lost the debate, repeatedly and to different posters of differing political

ideology. It's pretty clear to about everyone who has looked at this thread, Left, Right, & Center, save yourself. If you had any self-respect you'd simply acknowledge your proven error, and move on. Instead we've had continued embarrassing bouts of double-and-triple-down.

You lost the debate, dude - and lost it badly and repeatedly to different

posters - among both liberals and conservatives - across the board. Everyone who has watched this thread knows it, and you, actually, know it too.

Blech...need a trigger warning for that pic you posted.

Looks to me like Rush Limbaugh's definition of what a "feminist" is remains truer than ever....

And also notice she cherry-picks a very few individuals who could best be

described as fiscally conservative and socially liberal. Rank dishonesty even in answering a question she wasn't asked.

He's just doubling down and embarrassing himself in the process.

It really is sad to see folks who can't simply step back, say "well, I was wrong on that one" when the clearly are, and move on.

You are flatly distorting the meaning of that passage to fit your ends:

you said the DOI stated government was there to "make us happy." It does not. The government is the thing ACTED UPON in that passage you quote, not the thing ACTING UPON THE CITIZENS to make them "happy." The plain meaning of that phrase is that the people will fashion a government to their own satisfaction and happiness, not that the government will make each individual citizen "happy."

With this silly doubling-down you're simply embarrassing yourself.
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »