Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »

Gamle-ged

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: Nokomis, FL
Home country: US
Member since: Wed Nov 5, 2014, 01:58 AM
Number of posts: 27,202

About Me

Retired 3x, living comfortably on the Gulf Coast, biking, beachwalking, lifting free weights, eating mostly properly, keeping my mind active, in my seventh decade, intending to give Methuselah a run for the record...

Journal Archives

DOJ is anxious to get involved with the new (continuing) email scandal. Who will they have as...

... point person?

John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails

Now that the FBI has obtained the needed warrant to start poring over the 650,000 or so emails uncovered in Anthony Weiner's notebook, among which thousands of emails sent from Huma Abedin using Hillary Clinton's personal server, moments ago the US Justice Department announced it is also joining the probe, and as AP reported moments ago, vowed to dedicate all needed resources to quickly review the over half a million emails in the Clinton case.

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzik writes in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.

Oh yes. Recall our post from last week, "Clinton Campaign Chair Had Dinner With Top DOJ Official One Day After Hillary's Benghazi Hearing" in which we reported that John Podesta had dinner with one of the highest ranked DOJ officials the very day after Hillary Clinton's Benghazi testimony?

It was Peter Kadzik.

In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton's Campaign chair, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-31/doj-tells-congress-it-will-work-expeditiously-review-abedin-emails-there-just-one-pr
 



GOP, KGB, FBI, OH MY!...

Famed Democratic strategist James Carville may be the first Clinton surrogate to have officially lost his mind over the FBI’s decision to reopen its investigation into Clinton’s private email server. In an appearance on MSNBC on Monday, Carville relentlessly — and repeatedly — attacked the FBI’s decision to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton, asserting it is part of a conspiracy to subvert American democracy.

“The House Republicans and the KGB are trying to influence our democracy”

“This is in effect an attempt to hijack an election,” Carville claimed. “It’s unprecedented … the House Republicans and the KGB are trying to influence our democracy,” he said.

Apparently the fact that the Soviet security agency was disbanded in 1991 does not preclude its involvement in this vast, anti-Clinton conspiracy organized by the FBI, according to Carville. Poor Carville was clearly apoplectic at the news of Comey’s announcement, describing it as an assault or attack on American democracy multiple times.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/carville-melts-asserts-fbi-gop-kgb-cahoots/


Hillary literally became the definition of "pathological lying" on GOOGLE yesterday

If you had happened to Google the term ‘pathological lying’ on Sunday evening, you would have been met with none other than the bright, smiling face of presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. Before Wikipedia administrators put a temporary lock on the entry early Monday morning, the top Google result for the term was a link to the Wiki article displaying Clinton’s photo, along with the following quote defining pathological lying:

It is a stand-alone disorder as well as a symptom of other disorders such as psychopathy and antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic personality disorders, but people who are pathological liars may not possess characteristics of the other disorders. Excessive lying is a common symptom of several mental disorders.”

The revision history of the entry shows the picture of Clinton was originally added to the ‘pathological lying’ Wikipedia article on the morning of October 29th, but it wasn’t until the next night that the ever-vigilant internet community took notice and excitedly spread the word on Facebook andTwitter.
Unsurprisingly, most reactions were supportive of the alteration to the Wikipedia article, once again showing the public’s general distrust of the presidential candidate. A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University last year asked voters to say the first thing that came to mind when they thought of Hillary Clinton. The most popular response was “liar,” followed by “dishonest” and “untrustworthy.” Maybe if the biggest names in journalism weren’t outright colluding with Hillary’s campaign, that poll would have been more widely reported. Maybe.

http://www.infowars.com/hillary-literally-became-the-definition-of-pathological-lying-on-google-yesterday/






I just watched Fox News Sunday and saw Chris Wallace interview Hillary's Mook and TRY to...

.. get a cogent response from him as to whether Hillary asked Huma what was on her laptop and when he was told NO, he asked WHY she wouldn't ask and FIVE TIMES and was fobbed off each time. Mook used the word "hypothetical" a LOT!...

"STRONGER TOGETHER, Hillary, Huma and Carlos Danger!"..

Hillary takes a few... A VERY few questions...

... and suggests voters get out and vote early! The earlier they vote, the less they'll know what's coming from these thousands of new -emails!...



So, the FBI has the back - up server with all of Hillary's e-mails on it. What this first means is..

... that the excuses being frantically used by Democrats and the media about "Russian hackers" and Wikileaks "altering e-mails" and "out of context" have turned to dreck. Any e-mail in question can be quickly compared with the same e-mail on the server for accuracy.

Fun times ahead, I believe...

Clinton World Still Has No Good Answers on Russian Uranium Deal

Lots of good info folIows...


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/27/schweizer-russian-uranium-deal-clinton-world-no-good-answers/

More Voters Than Ever Want Term Limits for Congress

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is calling for term limits on members of Congress even though his party currently controls both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Voters agree more strongly than ever with the need for term limits but also still doubt Congress will go along with them.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 74% of Likely U.S. Voters favor establishing term limits for all members of Congress. Just 13% are opposed, while just as many (13%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on October 20 and 23, 2016 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/october_2016/more_voters_than_ever_want_term_limits_for_congress

Trump on track to win more Black votes than any GOP Candidate Since 1960

In the past month the number of black voters for Donald Trump has increased significantly.
At the beginning of October 9% of African Americans supported Trump.


Black Likely Voters for TRUMP @Rasmussen_Poll 
Oct 3 - 9%
Oct 6 - 12%
Oct 7 - 13%
Oct 10 - 14%
Oct 11 - 19%
Oct 12 - 19%
Oct 13 - 24% !

Thanks largely to the disaster Obama has been for our African-American population, and his coddling of illegal aliens stealing American jobs, hurting the African-American population most...
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 Next »