Newsvaping


Response to john262 (Original post)

Wed Jan 28, 2015, 06:14 PM

3. Now they are finding that they have formaldehyde and may be dangerous like regular cigs(link)

I would ban all smoking.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1413069?query=featured_home&&

Hidden Formaldehyde in E-Cigarette Aerosols

E-cigarette liquids are typically solutions of propylene glycol, glycerol, or both, plus nicotine and flavorant chemicals. We have observed that formaldehyde-containing hemiacetals, shown by others to be entities that are detectable by means of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy,1 can be formed during the e-cigarette “vaping” process. Formaldehyde is a known degradation product of propylene glycol that reacts with propylene glycol and glycerol during vaporization to produce hemiacetals (Figure 1Figure 1
Daily Exposures to Formaldehyde Associated with Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes.
). These molecules are known formaldehyde-releasing agents that are used as industrial biocides.5 In many samples of the particulate matter (i.e., the aerosol) in “vaped” e-cigarettes, more than 2% of the total solvent molecules have converted to formaldehyde-releasing agents, reaching concentrations higher than concentrations of nicotine. This happens when propylene glycol and glycerol are heated in the presence of oxygen to temperatures reached by commercially available e-cigarettes operating at high voltage. How formaldehyde-releasing agents behave in the respiratory tract is unknown, but formaldehyde is an International Agency for Research on Cancer group 1 carcinogen.4

Here we present results of an analysis of commercial e-liquid vaporized with the use of a “tank system” e-cigarette featuring a variable-voltage battery. The aerosolized liquid was collected in an NMR spectroscopy tube (10 50-ml puffs over 5 minutes; 3 to 4 seconds per puff). With each puff, 5 to 11 mg of e-liquid was consumed, and 2 to 6 mg of liquid was collected. At low voltage (3.3 V), we did not detect the formation of any formaldehyde-releasing agents (estimated limit of detection, approximately 0.1 μg per 10 puffs). At high voltage (5.0 V), a mean (±SE) of 380±90 μg per sample (10 puffs) of formaldehyde was detected as formaldehyde-releasing agents. Extrapolating from the results at high voltage, an e-cigarette user vaping at a rate of 3 ml per day would inhale 14.4±3.3 mg of formaldehyde per day in formaldehyde-releasing agents. This estimate is conservative because we did not collect all of the aerosolized liquid, nor did we collect any gas-phase formaldehyde. One estimate of the average delivery of formaldehyde from conventional cigarettes is approximately 150 μg per cigarette,3 or 3 mg per pack of 20 cigarettes. Daily exposures of formaldehyde associated with cigarettes, e-cigarettes from the formaldehyde gas phase, and e-cigarettes from aerosol particles containing formaldehyde-releasing agents are shown in Figure 1.

Inhaled formaldehyde has a reported slope factor of 0.021 kg of body weight per milligram of formaldehyde per day for cancer (http://oehha.ca.gov/risk/pdf/TCDBcas061809.pdf). Among persons with a body weight of 70 kg, the incremental lifetime cancer risk associated with long-term cigarette smoking at 1 pack per day may then be estimated at 9×10−4. If we assume that inhaling formaldehyde-releasing agents carries the same risk per unit of formaldehyde as the risk associated with inhaling gaseous formaldehyde, then long-term vaping is associated with an incremental lifetime cancer risk of 4.2×10−3. This risk is 5 times as high (as compared with the risk based on the calculation of Miyake and Shibamoto shown in Figure 1), or even 15 times as high (as compared with the risk based on the calculation of Counts et al. shown in Figure 1) as the risk associated with long-term smoking. In addition, formaldehyde-releasing agents may deposit more efficiently in the respiratory tract than gaseous formaldehyde, and so they could carry a higher slope factor for cancer.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 71 replies Author Time Post
john262 Jan 2015 OP
His Daughter Jan 2015 #1
john262 Jan 2015 #2
Badsamm Jan 2015 #50
john262 Jan 2015 #52
LineReply Now they are finding that they have formaldehyde and may be dangerous like regular cigs(link)
graham4anything4HC45 Jan 2015 #3
.30M1 Jan 2015 #5
MercATC Jan 2015 #19
john262 Jan 2015 #22
_eek Jan 2015 #24
question Jan 2015 #65
Strange Luck Jan 2015 #4
Let it go Jan 2015 #6
clem kadiddlehopper Jan 2015 #9
Let it go Jan 2015 #10
_eek Jan 2015 #25
Let it go Jan 2015 #33
_eek Jan 2015 #34
Let it go Jan 2015 #35
Brundlefly Jan 2015 #53
_eek Jan 2015 #57
Let it go Jan 2015 #61
Brundlefly Jan 2015 #62
Let it go Jan 2015 #63
Majnun Jan 2015 #7
In The Mood Jan 2015 #8
_eek Jan 2015 #21
In The Mood Jan 2015 #23
_eek Jan 2015 #26
In The Mood Jan 2015 #27
762Justice Jan 2015 #54
who_what_where Jan 2015 #11
question Jan 2015 #66
Hades Jan 2015 #12
batcat Jan 2015 #16
brew9876 Jan 2015 #13
Dork_Diggler Jan 2015 #14
batcat Jan 2015 #17
meanitt Jan 2015 #15
john262 Jan 2015 #20
meanitt Jan 2015 #30
john262 Jan 2015 #36
meanitt Jan 2015 #37
john262 Jan 2015 #40
question Jan 2015 #67
Currentsitguy Jan 2015 #39
UnicornWhisperer Jan 2015 #18
In The Mood Jan 2015 #28
brew9876 Jan 2015 #29
_eek Jan 2015 #31
brew9876 Jan 2015 #32
Jimmy Calhoun Jan 2015 #69
Charles Goodnight Jan 2015 #38
Currentsitguy Jan 2015 #41
Charles Goodnight Jan 2015 #42
Currentsitguy Jan 2015 #43
Charles Goodnight Jan 2015 #44
_eek Jan 2015 #59
762Justice Jan 2015 #45
john262 Jan 2015 #46
762Justice Jan 2015 #47
john262 Jan 2015 #48
762Justice Jan 2015 #49
john262 Jan 2015 #51
762Justice Jan 2015 #55
question Jan 2015 #68
Jimmy Calhoun Jan 2015 #70
_eek Jan 2015 #58
Currentsitguy Jan 2015 #60
who_what_where Jan 2015 #71
bpilgrim Jan 2015 #56
question Jan 2015 #64
Please login to view edit histories.

Newsvaping