Politicspolitics

In the discussion thread: Was pre Civil War slavery racist? [View all]

Response to Trumplethinskin (Original post)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 10:13 AM

22. Let's unpack a couple things with that

First, who is claiming racism doesn't exit? Yes the term has lost meaning and no longer being taken seriously because it is being used to label things that are not racism for the sake to trying to leverage the negative connotation connected to the term. That does not mean that actual racism doesn't exist. Now you will get people pointing out that institutionalized racism is no longer a problem at least in the US and that's a legitimate claim. Of course the fact that a lot of people who want to misuse the terms can't seem to grasp what the phrase institutionalized racism actually means does cause some confusion.

As to slavery being racist. Not in and of itself because slavery is not by definition inherently based on race. As practiced in the US pre Civil War yes that was racist because it was a key component to a system of superiority based almost if not entirely on race. So slavery is not necessary racial but in that case it was.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Trumplethinskin Oct 11 OP
Red_Nation Oct 11 #1
Louie Oct 11 #6
Red_Nation Oct 11 #17
GoldwatersSoul Oct 11 #20
RCW2014 Oct 11 #2
foia Oct 11 #3
Banshee 3 Actual Oct 11 #9
sipow Oct 11 #16
Louie Oct 11 #4
bfox74 Oct 11 #7
TM999 Oct 11 #5
Banshee 3 Actual Oct 11 #8
quad489 Oct 11 #15
rampartb Oct 11 #10
JaimeBondoJr Oct 11 #11
quad489 Oct 11 #12
Charlie Mike Oct 11 #13
Paradigm Oct 11 #14
Independent.mind Oct 11 #21
357blackhawk Oct 11 #18
_eek Oct 11 #19
LineNew Reply Let's unpack a couple things with that
Valishin Oct 11 #22
Please login to view edit histories.

Politicspolitics