Sciencesciencedeniertinfoilconspiracynuts


Response to Transcendence (Reply #35)

Sun Jul 12, 2015, 11:50 PM

36. The journal retracted due to the threat of legal action.

Good science really, really pisses Deniers off. And they have deep pockets. The paper was subsequently republished. Several times.

The "debunking" paper was itself "debunked" by yet another peer reviwed paper.

But that was a really good try. Total fail, though.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 39 replies Author Time Post
EGTrise Jul 2015 OP
nolidad Jul 2015 #1
Gunslinger201 Jul 2015 #2
EGTrise Jul 2015 #3
MeatSandwich Jul 2015 #14
EGTrise Jul 2015 #15
MeatSandwich Jul 2015 #16
EGTrise Jul 2015 #17
MeatSandwich Jul 2015 #22
EGTrise Jul 2015 #25
MeatSandwich Jul 2015 #27
rahtruelies Jul 2015 #4
marmot84 Jul 2015 #7
rahtruelies Jul 2015 #26
marmot84 Jul 2015 #31
rahtruelies Jul 2015 #33
marmot84 Jul 2015 #34
nolidad Jul 2015 #5
EGTrise Jul 2015 #6
nolidad Jul 2015 #11
EGTrise Jul 2015 #13
Paradigm Jul 2015 #8
EGTrise Jul 2015 #9
Paradigm Jul 2015 #10
MountainDew Jul 2015 #12
Letmypeoplevote Jul 2015 #20
MountainDew Jul 2015 #28
AZ0 Jul 2015 #18
EGTrise Jul 2015 #21
AZ0 Jul 2015 #23
EGTrise Jul 2015 #24
AZ0 Jul 2015 #30
Letmypeoplevote Jul 2015 #19
NotWhoUThink Jul 2015 #29
EGTrise Jul 2015 #32
Transcendence Jul 2015 #35
LineLineNew Reply The journal retracted due to the threat of legal action.
EGTrise Jul 2015 #36
Transcendence Jul 2015 #37
EGTrise Jul 2015 #38
Transcendence Jul 2015 #39
Please login to view edit histories.

Sciencesciencedeniertinfoilconspiracynuts