Sciencescienceclimatechangeisoprene


Response to AZ0 (Reply #19)

Wed Oct 14, 2015, 12:05 PM

29. The chart is bullshit.

It comes from the IPCC AR5 report. You can find it in a few places. Full report on page 14. Also in the supplemental tech material. Probably elsewhere. It is a typical 'baffle 'em with bullshit' strategy. Produce voluminous material with lots of charts and write the supporting text in a way that is tedious to follow.

Here is the the only key bit of info one need know about this graphic:
https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/supplementary/WG1AR5_TSSM_FINAL.pdf
Figure SPM.5 (and Figure TS.7) plots Radiative Forcing (RF) estimates in
2011 relative to 1750 and aggregated uncertainties for the main drivers
of climate change. This figure is different from similar figures shown in
previous IPCC report SPMs (though an analogous figure was shown in
Chapter 2 of AR4) as it evaluates the RF based on the emissions rather
than the concentration changes. An emitted compound changes the
atmospheric concentration of the same substance but may also impact
that of other atmospheric constituents through chemistry processes.

In other words the doomertists are trying to show the differences in CO2 emissions between 1750 and 2011. Not the actual differences of concentrations in the atmosphere which would be the metric that matters if one were actually trying to portray the cause in climate change. But since the IPCC doomertists are actually just a bunch of socialist weasels trying to promote a global government they focus on the emissions because it supports their malthusian anti-capitalism and the industrial revolution was evil mindset.

NEVER EVER believe a doomer. Most are too stupid to understand what they are saying. The rest are deliberately misleading the public to promote their socialist ideology.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 54 replies Author Time Post
AZ0 Oct 2015 OP
Junglejim43 Oct 2015 #1
AZ0 Oct 2015 #2
AZ0 Oct 2015 #40
ProudNYSTaxPayer Oct 2015 #51
EGTrise Oct 2015 #3
AZ0 Oct 2015 #4
AZ0 Oct 2015 #5
Jack Burton Oct 2015 #7
AZ0 Oct 2015 #8
Jack Burton Oct 2015 #9
AZ0 Oct 2015 #10
AZ0 Oct 2015 #6
EGTrise Oct 2015 #11
AZ0 Oct 2015 #12
EGTrise Oct 2015 #13
AZ0 Oct 2015 #18
EGTrise Oct 2015 #26
AZ0 Oct 2015 #34
AZ0 Oct 2015 #36
EGTrise Oct 2015 #43
AZ0 Oct 2015 #44
EGTrise Oct 2015 #45
AZ0 Oct 2015 #46
AZ0 Oct 2015 #52
EGTrise Oct 2015 #53
AZ0 Oct 2015 #54
smalllivingeddy Oct 2015 #14
AZ0 Oct 2015 #17
smalllivingeddy Oct 2015 #30
AZ0 Oct 2015 #39
smalllivingeddy Oct 2015 #41
AZ0 Oct 2015 #42
magdrop Oct 2015 #47
AZ0 Oct 2015 #48
magdrop Oct 2015 #49
magdrop Oct 2015 #50
stupidicus2 Oct 2015 #15
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #16
AZ0 Oct 2015 #19
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #20
AZ0 Oct 2015 #22
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #23
LineLineLineReply The chart is bullshit.
Jack Burton Oct 2015 #29
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #31
AZ0 Oct 2015 #21
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #24
AZ0 Oct 2015 #25
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #28
AZ0 Oct 2015 #32
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #35
AZ0 Oct 2015 #37
misanthroptimist Oct 2015 #38
Muzzlehatch Oct 2015 #27
AZ0 Oct 2015 #33
Please login to view edit histories.

Sciencescienceclimatechangeisoprene